This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
With a name like "Popular Front for the Liberation of the Sanjak of Alexandretta" they certainly sound irredentist and anti-Turkish... AnonMoos (talk) 01:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Or rather Syrian nationalist, as the article already states. FunkMonk (talk) 01:53, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
However, the name would seem to indicate going beyond general "Syrian nationalism" (a phrase which can have several meanings) to reopen one specific 70-year-old dispute with Turkey, in retaliation for Turkish policies... AnonMoos (talk) 01:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was named such long before the current dispute. It is not a novel sentiment. Syria never accepted the ceding of Antakiya, Iskanderoun, etc, but never really acted against it either, being too weak compared to Turkey. FunkMonk (talk) 03:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
were they not formed in 2011. Sayerslle (talk) 02:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There were predecessor organisations (with Ural's involvement) with similar names at least all the way back to the 70s. FunkMonk (talk) 16:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The ideology is claimed to be Syrian nationalism and Marxism by all sources. Saysersslll is inventing stuff loosely based on a single POV source, and reverting more than once[1][2], in addition to witing lame stuff such as "idiot" in his edit summaries. We resolve it here, or he gets reported. FunkMonk (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
if Josh landis puts an article up on his site then he presumably thinks it is worthy of attention and the article says "However, beneath this image of Syrian nationalism and leftist ideology lies a more narrow sectarian emphasis on defending the Alawite and Twelver Shi’a communities." - that is , I believe, the kind of sentence that invites the thought 'a nod is good as a wink to a blind horse' - and indicates something rather essential to an understanding of this movements ideology and motivations. so saying 'The ideology is claimed to be Syrian nationalism and Marxism by all sources' - is stretching it - here is a source, endorsed one presumes to some degree by josh Landis , that claims the ideology is significantly inflected with sectarian accents - perhaps I am giving too much prominence to this strain in the source - but it is there ,funkmoth - oh dear, we neither of us can spell the others name - Richard Dimbleby could hardly bear to say Malcolm Muggeridge's name he so despised him- so this difficulty has a tradition, funkmot. Sayerslle (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Landis is biased. He has called for bombing Syria several times. Therefore it is POV and unbalanced. FunkMonk (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
