Talk:Tøger Seidenfaden

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

please : do not censor factually correct information ![edit]

How is it against any WIKI-rules to state provable facts about a living person ? please, DO NOT delete relevant information . For instance it is imperative for the correct understanding of the so-called "Muhammed cartoon crisis" that people know,understand, and have access to, information about the affiliations of the involved parties . 83.233.182.187 (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The policy Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons requires that contentious material on living people must be cited to reliable sources. In your first version, the statement about the newspaper never reporting on the meetings was a violation of this as it had no source at all. The use of the global-elite.org-site as a reference is also not acceptable — self-published websites don't meet the criteria, and as far as I can tell the bilderberg.org-site has the same problem.
The reply from "ask politiken", you mentioned on my talk page is interesting and if they have printed it on their website, we can certainly use that? The bottom line is that the criteria for inclusion of information is verifiability, not truth. Hemmingsen 17:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]