Talk:TVP1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

TVP1 was launched November 25, 1952; regular emition was launched January 23, 1953. Check out this dates at Polish Wikipedia. --Ariok

TV KLKG and RTP1[edit]

How can I find these sources? But my teacher who teach me Egnlish is from Poland and she said RTP1 closed at 10pm in commernist but I don't know if it's called RTP1 or not--125.25.11.17 (talk) 12:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to edit the article, it's up to you to find sources (see WP:RS). A Google search is really your best approach, but if that doesn't find anything and you cannot find reliable sources elsewhere, simply do not edit the article - we really can't have people just adding what their teacher told them -- Boing! said Zebedee 12:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TV KLKG never used. RTP1 is using only in Portugal for Portuguse 1st channel.--188.47.100.97 (talk) 15:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
188.47.100.97, this is the thing I'm waiting for! The reply!. OK first time you don't delete the thread--125.25.41.27 (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RTP1 - I can find only Portugal
TV KLKG - It's impossible to find it. As all the datas is destroyed by Polish Rouge.--125.25.41.27 (talk) 03:44, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Polish rouge isn't exist!--125.25.11.182 (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IT EXISTS!!!--125.25.237.58 (talk) 07:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Polish rouge is fake, lie, stupidity & worse.--188.47.82.46 (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This Talk page is for discussing the TVP1 article, so would you two please stop this childish arguing about "Polish rouge", which most certainly does not exist and has never existed! -- Boing! said Zebedee 19:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RTP1 is fake[edit]

Explain, why RTP1 it's still real by boy from Thailand (is vandal) with Polish teacher. May interfere with the Portuguese 1st nationwide channel. Properly to be still TP1.--178.56.164.44 (talk) 09:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't refer to another editor as a "troll" - that is a violation of WP:CIVIL and could get you blocked. It's much better to stick to the facts (eg state that "RTP1" is factually incorrect), and provide some evidence if necessary. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's appearantly real. My teacher is from Poland & she told me this. I WON'T VANDAL IF SHE HAVEN"T TOLD ME!!! And I'm ThaiBeyond02, not fun17092008 on YT as you said. Fun17092008 is a Malaysian. Not Burmese or Thai.--125.25.250.121 (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been told many times that your teacher is not a reliable source - and you must also not use abusive edit summaries, such as "Boing! said Zebedee is a vandal." Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Teacher of IP address 125.25.xxx.xxx completely lying. This article is fully banned for the IP address 125.25.xxx.xxx.--188.47.107.9 (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is better if you don't accuse others of lying - I suspect it is more likely to be a misunderstanding, as we really don't know exactly what the teacher actually said. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NEXT YEAR[edit]

UNPROTECT PLEASE--125.25.82.172 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHO SAID TP1 EXISTS??? EVEN IN 80'S??? NO!!! TP1 DOESN'T EXIST IN ANY TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2, 1970!!!

Wait, did I hurt your ears?--125.25.82.172 (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really panic that it will ends next year--125.25.82.172 (talk) 12:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know it has never been known as TP1? (Answer here please, not on my Talk page) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know at least
You don't know please don't put it without evidences--125.25.209.252 (talk) 01:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, firstly, it wasn't me who added "TP1", so I don't need to provide any evidence myself - you're the one who's trying to make the change to remove it, and you are not a trusted editor. So sorry, you can't just say "I know" - we need evidence to support any edits you make, as you have been told before. We have had lots of vandal edits and nonsense from the small number of IP editors in Bangkok, so we simply cannot take the word of any of you without evidence. And if you say you are not one of the vandals, then I'm afraid it's just your hard luck that we can't tell you apart - as you know, you can easily create your own account to avoid that problem. So if you want "TP1" removed, use the {{Edit protected}} {{Edit semi-protected}} template here on this Talk page with a documented explanation of how you know that your requested change is correct. If you make a proper request with the proper evidence, I'll be happy to help - but I'm afraid I'm going to have to ignore anything else from you, as I have more important things to do than keep explaining things to you over and over again. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I edit only 2 articles every time - TVP1 and TVP2
TP1 was added by 83.26.200.2 but this is just restyle. The very first one who added this is 83.26.193.123. These IP editors are not trusted editor as well. They just put it. It wasn't have this before. And this article got no sources.--125.25.209.252 (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How do you think?--125.25.37.132 (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Repeat: "if you want "TP1" removed, use the {{Edit protected}} {{Edit semi-protected}} template here on this Talk page with a documented explanation of how you know that your requested change is correct." I have no more to say -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Edit semi-protected}} remove TP1--125.27.53.182 (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you have been told before, you'll need to do more than state the change you want. You will also need to tell us why you want it removed and where you got your information from - and that is especially important considering the record of IPs from Bangkok making unsupported (and often blatantly false) changes to articles like this. So, please explain why TP1 should be removed, tell us where you (in Thailand) got your Polish TV information, and provide at least one reliable source that supports your reasoning. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Apologies, I told you the wrong template earlier - it should have been {{Edit semi-protected}}. I've changed it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deactivated the {{edit semi-protected}} for now, since it's obvious there isn't currently consensus. Note that that template attracts maintenance attention and should really only be used for uncontroversial changes, as substantial changes with consensus usually already have at least one autoconfirmed user available anyway. --NYKevin @295, i.e. 06:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care very much now, I care North Korea, Belarus and Vietnam--125.25.17.4 (talk) 10:23, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 89.79.36.104, 6 February 2011[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}}


89.79.36.104 (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please specify what you want changing. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 15:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Change all written "Poland" to "Mars"--113.53.212.38 (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2 and 1[edit]

Me and my teacher said RTP was real 188.47 said RTP was fake.

2 and 1, then 2 win.

Counting down to 25 March 11 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.53.212.38 (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WTF, why am I using Vietnamese IP address? I completely living in Thailand--113.53.212.38 (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]