Jump to content

Talk:Taiwan Strait Tunnel Project

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aggressive Military Use?

[edit]

I don't really understand why "the tunnel's potential for aggressive military use remains a concern to Taiwan" because if anyone tried to attack the other side through the tunnel, all the defending side had to do is just closing the tunnel, then the attacking side would have no way to run. Has anyone heard about attacks through a undersea tunnel before? This kind of concern seems just ridiculous to me. DerekJoe 07:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derekjoe (talkcontribs)

Agreed, this bit does seem I bit silly. I'll try a rewrite see if it sticks.Zeonglow (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no sources

[edit]

This article is sourced by two 404s. If this is merely a proposal thrown out there, and one not taken seriously at that, then maybe it does not yet deserve an article... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.14.173.51 (talk) 00:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it is not a reason to kill an articel just because is sourced by 404s. The better method would be to find actual material to the topic and improve the article. There is enough material around, just google for the titel of the article.--Pechristener (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]