Talk:Talang 2007/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- I am sorry that you have had to wait so long for a review, but as this nomination had not been listed at WP:GAN, no-one knew that you were seeking review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- I fixed three and tagged three dead links, using WP:CHECKLINKS.
- There are some statements that I tagged as needing citations.
- Those references that I could access were verifiable,reliable sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The article covers the subject in reasonable depth and is focussed upon it.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- There are a few unsupported statements that I tagged as lacking a WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days, for above issues to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- I note that the nominator is blocked indefinitely so I shall fail this nomination as they cannot address the issues raised. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: