Talk:Tamluk

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: West Bengal / Cities Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

This is a very uneven article that has a lot of information presented in blocks. It needs to be wikified and cleaned up since there are many grammatical errors too. Also sections need to be consistent with the wikipedia manual. I'll work on it, but please do NOT remove the tags before the work is done. Thanks in advance. --Antorjal 14:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the tags.

Please do not remove the wikify and cleanup tags until both have been done. What needs to be done is the following:

A lead paragraph
A history section (now the whole article is on history)
economics
geography and weather
population and demographics
media
CITE references
copy-editing the whole article because it is replete with grammatical and spelling errors
There are very few links. That's why I have the wikify tag there too. It just does not coform with the guidelines for the encyclopedia.

Thanks. --Antorjal 13:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not upto the wikipedia manual please follow WP:INCITIES and WP:MOS. Amartyabag (Talk) 10:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re Tamralipta

I have moved most of the Tamralipta based content to a separate article and wikified the first two sections of this one. I need to do the other remaining sections. Feel free to help but check for grammar, spelling, accuracy, and linking. Thanks. --Antorjal 01:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bheema

Apparently, the forthcoming movie is not about the belief referred to in this article. Certainly an entertainment would not be a secure basis for the argument made here. Fconaway 07:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tamluk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061104210222/http://db.metropolis.it:80/comuni/index99.asp to http://db.metropolis.it/comuni/index99.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong photo.

The photo of the temple is not from TAMLUK but from Chandannagar, Odisha. Invitrosantanu (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]