Talk:Tanah Merah MRT station/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 02:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello? @ZKang123? Brachy08 (Talk) 05:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thing is there are no non-primary sources when it comes to describing the station locations. ZKang123 (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Chiming in here having recently witnessed a mess with a similar point of contention: a primary source is not automatically unreliable because it is primary in nature; it can contain encyclopedic information that cannot be found elsewhere, in which case it is likely the best source for that information. Specifically for their use here, train operating hours and intervals, as well as locations in geographical proximity to stations, fall under
straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge
(from WP:PRIMARY). ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 09:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC) - Fair enough. Brachy08 (Talk) 00:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Chiming in here having recently witnessed a mess with a similar point of contention: a primary source is not automatically unreliable because it is primary in nature; it can contain encyclopedic information that cannot be found elsewhere, in which case it is likely the best source for that information. Specifically for their use here, train operating hours and intervals, as well as locations in geographical proximity to stations, fall under
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
- b (inline citations to reliable sources): ,
FN 32-33 are primary sources, try finding secondary sources for them. - c (OR):
- d (copyvio and plagiarism): , checked with Earwig’s tool.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Not so much bias.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars here.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): , all images are own work, and have their CC tags.
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- No issues so far! Just fix the non-primary source problem and you’re good to go! I left out FN 28 and 29, but it is best to find non-primary sources for them, but I’ll let them pass, it’s a GA review after all.
- Pass/Fail:
