Talk:Tanner Glass

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTanner Glass has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 7, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tanner Glass/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AGK [] 22:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Concisely written article. No prose or language errors came across during review.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Covers all aspects of the subject matter in adequate depth.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Satisfies WP:NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article. Incident is not a current one and is not rapidly unfolding.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Sparse but adequate use of images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I like how well this article flows: it gives good, progressive coverage of his entire career, supplemented by the career statistics and personal life sections. I'm happy to grant this article GA status. AGK [] 22:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]