Talk:Tanzanian shilling/Archives/2012
This is an archive of past discussions about Tanzanian shilling. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New East African shilling
There is no mention here of the proposed adoption of the East African Shilling, anybody know anything about that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.186.95.89 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 19 April 2007
- See East African shilling#Second East African Shilling and East African Community. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 19:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The local name for this currency is shilingi, with shilling only appearing on the first series of banknoes from 1966. Hence, we ought to move this page to Tanzanian shilingi.
- Oppose mix'n'match of Swahili and English. "Tanzanian shilling" is in common use.[1][2] [3] And a googlefight of "Tanzanian shilling" vs "Tanzanian shilingi" gives it to the incumbent WP usage by a margin of 1.23 million to 52.[4] --DeLarge 10:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: for the same reasons, I'd recommend reverting the stylistic changes in the most recent edit to the page which switched the primary/parenthetical usage from English (Swahili) to Swahili (English) for the same reason.[5] --DeLarge 10:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Shilling is the common name for the currency in the English speaking world. (PS I had to delete the gocurrency link from the DeLarge's comments as it was preventing additional comments as it is a spam link) Number 57 11:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Support per the currency WikiProject guidelines. —Nightstallion (?) 12:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Support per current style guide: Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose this request and the arbitrary current numismatics style guidlines per WP:USEENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME. — AjaxSmack 02:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose seems shilling is far more commonly used, and is English, too. --Cheers, Komdori 01:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Could AjaxSmack perhaps explain what's "arbitrary" about Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style?
Dove1950 10:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes s/he could. Those style guidelines suspend WP:UE and WP:COMMONNAME for the names of currencies but not for the adjectives modifying them. On top that, some currencies are then are arbitrarily exempted from those rules (e.g., Finnish mark, Swiss franc, New Taiwan dollar, and numerous pounds, rubles, and rupees). I'm not sure how the Tanzanian shilling slipped through the cracks but would be happy if it was allowed to remain among the flouters. — AjaxSmack 03:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Finnish markka is no longer a flouter. Swiss franc is an awkward one due to four possibilities. Which pounds and rupees are you refering to? All that I'm aware of use these names on the currency, either exclusively or in conjunction with other names, raising similar problems to Swiss franc. The only obvious flouter is the New Taiwan dollar, which is partially dealt with in Chinese yuan. However, just because one or two exceptions exist is no reason to preserve other exceptions. It's worth remembering that currency names appear on the currency in the local form (exclusively in the case of the shilingi) and this is why those names should have the prominence we assign them through Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style.
Dove1950 09:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Finnish markka is no longer a flouter. Swiss franc is an awkward one due to four possibilities. Which pounds and rupees are you refering to? All that I'm aware of use these names on the currency, either exclusively or in conjunction with other names, raising similar problems to Swiss franc. The only obvious flouter is the New Taiwan dollar, which is partially dealt with in Chinese yuan. However, just because one or two exceptions exist is no reason to preserve other exceptions. It's worth remembering that currency names appear on the currency in the local form (exclusively in the case of the shilingi) and this is why those names should have the prominence we assign them through Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style.
- I'll probably regret pointing these out but some of the other currency articles using non-native names in countries where the first official language is (or was) not English and/or where the English name does not appear on the coins and notes (not including rubles) are Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark, Brunei dollar, Chinese customs gold unit, Cypriot pound, Djiboutian franc, Egyptian pound, Anglo-Saxon pound, Hawaiian dollar, Irish pound, Libyan pound, Macanese pataca, Malagasy franc, Maltese pound, Mongolian dollar, Mongolian tugrug, Moroccan franc, Mauritanian ouguiya, Philippine peso, Somali shilling, Somaliland shilling, Sudanese pound, Syrian pound, Old Taiwan dollar, and most rupees (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, &c.), various piastres among others.
- Some of the supposed "native" names are a little silly. As pointed out on the style talk page previously, the New Taiwan dollar is not called a "yuan" in Chinese and the word appears nowhere on the coins or notes (it's called 新台幣 measured in 圓) yet in nearly every English situation in the country, official and unofficial, the term New Taiwan dollar is used. While this logic may have kept the article at its English name it has not saved others such as the Israeli pound, Lebanese pound, Chinese cash (Chinese wen?? Come on.) despite clear prevalence of English usage in some cases, even at the official level.
- The arbitrariness (is that a word?) extends quite wide: Polish rubel but Russian ruble, Lebanese lira but Egyptian pound, Ottoman Turkish piastre but Turkish kuruş. And "tugrug" is neither a transliteration of Mongolian (tögrög) nor the English (tugrik).
- I'll copy this discussion to the style talk page to solicit corrections if I'm wrong. — AjaxSmack 04:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics/Style
Dove1950 10:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics/Style
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 08:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:TZ10000-02.jpg
Image:TZ10000-02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:TZ2000-02.jpg
Image:TZ2000-02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:TZ500-02.jpg
Image:TZ500-02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.