Talk:Tassilo III, Duke of Bavaria

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pearson & Becher

Without having read her book, Pearson's position regarding Tassilo seems basically to be a summary of the work by Matthias Becher in his "Eid und Herrschaft" from 1989, and hopefully Pearson did attribute these ideas to him in her footnotes. The same should be done here, instead of presenting it as her own original thought. Still it couldn't hurt verifying if Pearson does, with regard to the Royal Frankish Annals, indeed talk about a "reworking" or "revision" of an (unnamed) "original document": the Royal Annals were only compiled around 788 (so there is no earlier "original" version from the 750s/760s that could have been altered), but they do indeed deviate from - and probably embellish for political reasons - reports in some older (contemporary) Frankish annals which the compiler used as his source for the events surrounding Tassilo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.22.50.175 (talk) 12:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]