Talk:Ted L. Nancy

Mtamony edits

Mtamony has been reverting edits and saying the he is waiting on legal advice. Consensus guides Wikipedia. Please justify your edits with Wikipedia policy, not legal threats. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody threatened you. I simply asked if you needed an explanation from Ted L Nancy legal representation as to why the page should not be randomly redirected or edited. Your current edits are factually incorrect. The legal trademark holder for Ted L Nancy has asked for the changes to be made. Does this not fall under Wikipedia policy? Mtamony —Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you so urgently need this page changed that you can't wait for us to draft newer content?--Mtamony (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to correctly edit this wikipedia page under the direction of Ted L. Nancy legal representation. I will attempt to provide valid citations and links where needed.--Mtamony (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the problematic issues in detail here and provide reliable, third party sources - the community of experienced Wikipedia editors will decide what is relevant or correct content according to Wikipedia policies, and not someone's legal representative. Edit warring will simply result in the page being blocked and eventually the users too. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing the page with facts provided by the representatives of the Ted L Nancy trademark. There shouldn't be any problematic issues with that. I am also attempting to contruct the page so it fits better with Wikipedia's design.--Mtamony (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:No original research, one of the core policies for Wikipedia. From that page: "All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source," not information given to you by a legal representative. Do any of these examples apply to you, Mtamony? -- Wikipedical (talk) 22:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to provide reliable, published sources for what I am posting. I have a job, a child, a wife, etc. I will try to add these citations as soon as possible. I would also ask, do any of these examples apply to you, Wikipedical? I have not been paid a penny to do any of this. --Mtamony (talk) 00:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, they don't, but I only ask since you have claimed to be corresponding with the trademark holder and legal representatives. I also ask since your only significant edits to Wikipedia belong to the Ted L. Nancy, Barry Marder, and Jerry Seinfeld pages, which is why I am curious. -- Wikipedical (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Observation: The references on this article do not add up to notability for it. At best the article should be merged to another article on the same topic and for which WP:Reliable sources can be found (no blogs, no Larry King videos, no interviews, for example). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. After moving most of the information from this page to the pseudonym's real-life authors' articles, I made this page into a disambiguation page. This whole dispute began when Mtamony challenged those efforts by undoing my edits. -- Wikipedical (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedical this immediately became about your ego and whatever agenda you have. You did not move the content you deleted it calling it cruft once it was on Barry's page. The character is a fictional entity. Huckleberry Finn has a Wikipedia page, Winnie-The-Pooh has a Wikipedia page. Why can't Ted L Nancy have a Wikipedia page? How can it be changed yet still exist in a way that satisfies Wikipedia?--Mtamony (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]