Talk:Teesside University

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Teesside University is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

untitled[edit]

Update - much better. I do feel the present update shapes up well actually. At least now it manages to accomodate the concerns of both admirers and sceptics as well as colouring people's perception of said institution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.64.14 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 12 July 2005 ((UTC))

"Mickey Mouse degrees"[edit]

Mickey Mouse degrees do not exist. It is a dysphemism created by tabloids and promoted by those with an agenda for maintaining social distinctions. "Less prestigious subjects" is a more sophisticated, NPOV way of expressing the phenomenon. The JPS 20:08, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good work JPS, lets keep this as 'encyclopediac' fare rather than submitting to the abuse of plainly derogatory one-sidedness. As there is no 'policing' system we have to be open to those articles with vulnerabilities, of which there are many. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MRacer (talk • contribs) 17:03, 12 August 2005 ((UTC))

University ratings[edit]

(I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)

There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 23:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Reference[edit]

The source for the information on the name, logo, and motto change is probably supposed to be to the Evening Gazette newspaper. Instead, it is to the Wikipedia article about the Evening Gazette, a circular reference. Can someone with more knowledge about UK newspapers fix this? Robert McClenon (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not all references have a link to an online source. The link to the Wikipedia article is from the name of the publisher, not the name of the article, and is a common style element for citations. The citation is perfectly valid, I retrieved the article from Gale InfoTrac and have added the page number. Spinning Spark 00:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict between Infobox and History[edit]

There is an inconsistency between the motto stated in the infobox, and the history which states that the motto was changed in 2009. I would edit the infobox, except that the history about the change does not appear to be properly sourced (as noted above). Robert McClenon (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gained University Status[edit]

The bit about gaining University status makes it sounds like the university only started in 1992, and that before that date there was no way to obtain a degree in Middlesbrough. It also gives the impression that some great effort was made to improve everything so that it could pass some test of eligibility and climb onto the ladder of proper seats of learning. In fact, Teesside Polytechnic awarded degrees - as I'm sure Constantine College did prior to that (although I don't really know about that) - and, rather than make improvements to become a university, it became a university when polytechnics were done away with and they all became universities, automatically, throughout the United Kingdom. So much for "Gaining university status". Sunderland Polytechnic became a university a little before the rest, because Sunderland had become an official city - and a city should have a university. In reality, all polytechnics had been de facto universities for many years before 1992; the national conversion was just a formality. Francis Hannaway (talk) 17:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Teesside University/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires extensive references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Convert links in text to reference or move to external links section

Keith D 12:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Teesside University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Cancelled film" section[edit]

Whole section about a storm in a teacup, a film screening that might not have happened - is it really noteworthy? BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]