Talk:Television in Indonesia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Television in Indonesia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Indonesia High‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Palapa#Series A|Palapa A1]] The anchor (#Series A) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Please help[edit]

WP:RS are needed for this article Satu Suro 02:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking back through the article history, I see a large chuck of content added by this IP edit. It appears to be a machine translation and is largly unintelligible. As the content has remained in place without major improvement since February, I propose that the article be reverted back to a point before the content was added. If the content can be re-worked, or the IP convinced to explain what they're attempting to convey, the content may be salvageable. I've not any success in communicating with users from the 125.162 range in the past, but if they can be brought into the discussion it would certainly be helpful. Tiderolls 04:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Give up now - there are a significant number of ids editor who never reply for any reason Satu Suro 14:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have stopped attempting to draw the IPs into discussion. When I first happened on the 125.162s I thought that they were trying to help in their way and were not aware of the existence of the MOS. After almost six months of cleaning up their "edits" without a single word from them, I have come to the conclusion that their disruption is not accidental. SatuSoro, would you think it a bad idea to revert the article as suggested? Is the content salvageable? It's very possible that I am missing something obvious that could be done to make the edits work and would be open to any such idea. Thanks for your input. Tiderolls 22:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]