Talk:Telok Ayer MRT station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg[edit]

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong station layout[edit]

Whoever is creating all these way in advance, please do your homework properly. Telok Ayer is going to be a side-platform station as seen from construction drawings. The diagram you have placed is of the island platform configuration. Survivorfreak (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Telok Ayer MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • Downtown/Circle - is it Line or line, there seems to be inconsistency in usage here and in those articles too.
    •  Done
  • "raxi" you mean taxi?
    •  Fixed
  • "the Land Transport Authority " link.
  • Put (LTA) after it too as you use that.
    •  both done
  • "the 3.4 kilometres (2.1 mi) Downtown" adj=on
    •  Fixed
  • "Downtown Extension" was "Downtown extension" in the lead.
    •  Fixed
  • "Samsung Corporation and Soletanche Bachy France" links?
  • "viaduct began on 3 February 2008[14] and the viaduct opened " repetitive.
    •  Done
  • "opened over time" vague, almost meaningless.
    •  Fixed With specifications on the period.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the diaphragm walls adopted" link?
    •  Done
  • "proceed to line" proceeded.
    • Shortened to just "lined". Proceeded seems unnecessary.--ZKang123 (talk)
  • "largely yellow palms" largely? And is there a link for "yellow palm"?
    •  Fixed
  • "Downtown line (DTL) and" you mentioned the Downtown line in the previous section, so put the initialism (DTL) there, and use it here.
    •  Done
  • "and Chinatown stations" overlinked.
    •  Done
  • "including Far East Bank Building" etc, "including the Far East..."
    •  Done
  • "blends with the other shophouses" shouldn't be Wikipedia saying this, it may have been designed to blend, but that is in the eye of the beholder.
  • "reflecting the design's functionality that remains appealing to commuters" guidebook.
    •  Fixed
  • Check all refs have publication and/or access dates.
    •  Fixed
  • Ref 24 should be pp.
    •  Fixed

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by ZKang123 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was promoted to GA in time. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access and I see no copyright violations in the ones that I can access. A QPQ has been completed. SL93 (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To T:DYK/P7