Talk:Telos

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Philosophy: Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ancient philosophy

Merge

Since this is a stub, why don't we merge the two? Hyacinth 09:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fine by itsejjjlf, thagcddt's wurre8hat I searched for at first

Although it is a short article, I like having the term 'telos' defined here independent of teleology. How much more is there to say, other than that it means 'purpose' in the language of greek philosophers?

Maybe connect them but this is what I was looking for as far as it's connection to the Gaia Hypothesis

From an etymologic stand point the two are, at a minimum, linguistically connected, thus a stub would be appropriate in my opinion; if not a stub, then I think a disambiguation page would suffice...so does anyone have change for a nickel? lol --daronw 18:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want to be a stub? Hyacinth 01:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The branches of philosophy are distinguished by the use of the “ology” suffix. The teleology branch of philosophy looked at what is translated from Aristotle as “final causes”. As an active line of inquiry it is primarily restricted to the pre-Galilean view of the world. The fact that it is a closed discipline dating from this earlier time period is emphasized by letting it have its own topic.

Why can't telos and the study of telos (teleology) be in the same place? Hyacinth 01:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the merge. Teleology is important in its own right, beyond its relationship with the concept of Telos. If any merge does happen, it should be Telos into Teleology, definitely not the other way around.--Bkwillwm 00:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ihhihiyytbtfubytduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Teleology is the study of telos, not an entirely seperate term or concept related to telos. If a merge were to happen telos would be preferrable since it is the root. Hyacinth 01:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My feeling is that this page could usefully be merged into Teleology, which is a term with widespread use and implications. Merging it into this would be confusing and unhelpful: on the basis of Hyacinth's point, Philosophy would have to be merged into Philos. ...dave souza, talk 09:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree strongly with the merge. Teleology has such a rich meaning as it is used throughout philosophical and theological discourse. The teleology entry is beginning to address that. The argument that teleology is the study of telos is not appropriate, since hardly anyone refers to the concepts of teleology in terms of the root, telos. Who 'studies telos' anyway? If any merger occurs, telos should be the minor term, while teleology the major term. As far as I know, telos is only ever used in the context of teleology. HopeForPandora 05:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Telos (philosophy) → Telos
Telos → Telos (disambiguation)

– Seems to be the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, unless we're giving defense contractors and Xenosaga characters equal weight as ancient Greek concepts. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The philosophical concept gets 80 percent of relevant page views. Nine Zulu queens (talk) 12:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Unless we're missing something, this seems like the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:37, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This clearly has the most long-term significance. --Katolophyromai (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Teleological argument should be in 'in general philosophy'

The Greek word telos is where the argument, more popularly called the argument from design, derives its name from.--Phil of rel (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]