Talk:Tenerus (beetle)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 24 March 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Tenerus (beetle) → ? – misleading, because only one taxon exists. Correct is Tenerus (genus) Estopedist1 (talk) 10:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Again, I strongly oppose these attempts to make disambiguations MORE ambiguous. PLEASE stop proposing these moves, or attempting to revert them. Dozens of other editors are trying very hard to refine these article titles, and you are threatening to undo all of our hard work. Let me propose a simple rule of thumb: a disambiguation should not refer to any rank higher than an order, UNLESS that order has no single, universal common name. So, for example, all beetle names would say "Xxxxx (beetle)" but if the order was Neuroptera, which has no single common name for all its members, then you would use "Yyyyy (insect)". Yes, there are some older articles created that use "Zzzzz (genus)", but I and other editors are gradually rplcing those with more refined titles, rather than making the titles LESS informative, as you are trying to do. Dyanega (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose, "Tenerus (beetle)" is clearer than "Tenerus (genus)" while being just as concise. Adumbrativus (talk) 10:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.