Talk:Terrain cartography

new page

New page for combination of all relief depiction. ANy alternative organization structures are welcome--Natcase 06:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Natcase 0630 UTC 16 Nov 2006[reply]

merge proposal

see discussion under Talk:Topographic map

illustrations format

Pictures = 1000 words, so how can we have a relatively small text plus a lot of photos and make it work. Gallery maybe? Titles in the photos? Any ideas?--Natcase (talk) 07:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Swisstopo Bluemlisalp 50.png

The image Image:Swisstopo Bluemlisalp 50.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree image removal

I have removed the nonfree image because it fails several of the non-free content criteria. First, it is replaceable with a free map (NFCC1). If there are no public domain (i.e. very old) maps that use this technique, someone could ask a Wikipedian at the graphics lab to create a sample map that demonstrates the same technique. Furthermore, it fails NFCC8 - it does not significantly increase readers' understanding, more than words alone would. A reader should have imagination sufficient to understand what a topographic map with different colored lines looks like, even if they do not see one. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree that using a map specially created for Wikipedia would be an appropriate replacement. I see a parallel in the non-free images of modern art that are used not only on articles about the artists, but also on articles about the techniques and styles. However, you do have a point about there being old out-of-copyright maps using coloured contour lines. It happens that the use of this technique goes back further than I thought: back at least to 1870. There is an example on the Swisstopo web site. Although the old maps have a slightly different look than modern maps, using an old one would better show the historical development of the subject. It may be allowable to use the example mentioned as a source for an image, but I think it would be better if someone can get a scan of a smaller section at a higher resolution, so that it is easier to see the individual lines. It would be good to include black, blue and brown lines in the sample. JonH (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, we can just use the out-of-copyright Swiss Siegfried Maps to illustrate the concept. --dab (𒁳) 09:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It happens that File:Berninapass 1877 Siegfriedkarte.jpg was already available in Commons category Old maps of Switzerland. (I did not find it before becaause it is not in the Atlas of Switzerland.) JonH (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hypsometric tints

In his map of central Italy, c.1502, Leonardo da Vinci introduced the cartographic convention of using color to indicate changes in elevation. See http://baltimore.about.com/od/events/ig/Walters-Art-Museum-Map-Exhibit/Leonardo-da-Vinci-Map.htm. Should this be included? PhilUK (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No response, so I did it anyway. PhilUK (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.shaded-relief.com
Triggered by \bshaded-relief\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

rename

why not just "terrain depiction" or "terrain cartography"? ("mapping" may mean measurement or depiction; "representation" may mean storage or depiction; "relief" can be the emotion or the sculptural technique.) Fgnievinski (talk) 03:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

terrain visualization seemed best, as it's a more common word that "depiction", and it's also not discipline-specific, but then I found out about terrain rendering, which I thought best to keep separate from the present terrain cartography. Fgnievinski (talk) 05:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the history of the title of this page, but I suspect it has changed a few times. "Terrain cartography" is a bit clunky, but there isn't really a nice standard term. Does that mean that it shouldn't be a separate page? I hope not! Bplewe (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Terrain cartography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080528053109/http://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/internet/swisstopo/en/home/products/maps/leisure/hiking.parsysrelated1.96279.downloadList.81398.DownloadFile.tmp/symbolsen.pdf to http://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/internet/swisstopo/en/home/products/maps/leisure/hiking.parsysrelated1.96279.downloadList.81398.DownloadFile.tmp/symbolsen.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shaded relief

Does Shaded relief deserve its own page to cover the math and algorithms more in depth, as well as all of the extensions (I only added a few of the ones that have been proposed)? Bplewe (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul

As part of working through a lot of cartography pages, I added a fair amount to this page, especially to Shaded relief. It was enough of an overhaul that I reset the WikiProject maps status, so please re-review it if you get a chance.