Talk:Tetracentron hopkinsii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tetracentron hopkinsii leaf fossil
Tetracentron hopkinsii leaf fossil
  • ... that the Eocene leaf species Tetracentron hopkinsii (pictured) wasn't confirmed from Washington State until 2018? Source:Manchester et al 2018: "However, additional specimens have confirmed the presence of this species at Republic")

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 23:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: recently moved from draft user space Seven Pandas (talk) 21:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK text[edit]

Is the DYK text incomplete or missing something? Or perhaps it's using niche jargon? I'm struggling to understand what "was not confirmed from Washington state" is supposed to mean. Vadim Galimov (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in the article, leaves resembling T. hopkinsii were tentatively identified in 2007, but it wasn't until further fossils had been recovered that researched confirmed the Washington State fossils were of the same species as the British Columbia fossils.--Kevmin § 15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]