Talk:Thalmann algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content[edit]

This article has a wealth of sources and a dearth of content. Can it be fleshed-out into at least a start-class article? --RexxS (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 20:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B class checklist[edit]

1 The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. - It has reliable sources, no controversial material, solidly referenced.

2 The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. - It contains basic description, some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics are missing. Unsure how much more would be needed.

3 The article has a defined structure. - Content is organized into groups of related material, including a lead section but could probably be expanded with more sections.

4 The article is reasonably well-written. - The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly. The Manual of Style has been followed fairly closely.

5 The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. - There is not much scope for illustration. The most useful diagram is present.

6 The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. - The article assumes some technical background in the field. Technical terms are used without much explanation.

Article clearly does not meet B-class criteria, but probably makes it for C.

Comment requested. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 20:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thanks. I changed the tag to C-class. —Patrug (talk) 06:13, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thalmann algorithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]