Talk:The Bible in a Year
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the article!.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Removed sentence
[edit]@Tipaloo, I wanted to talk about the removed sentence. I agree that it's an opinion, but I don't see what why means it should be removed. It's clearly described as opinion (and specifically the opinion of an Ascension staff member), as opposed to being given in Wikipedia's voice. It strikes me as a relevant and interesting detail worth keeping. What are your thoughts? —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Tipaloo, any thoughts on this? With no response or input from others, I plan to re-instate the sentence in a few days. —Ganesha811 (talk) 22:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Ganesha811 I don't feel like it adds much to the page as it's just an opinion. I think that the affect COVID had on the podcast is interesting, but I think trying to find another supporting source about how covid affected podcasts would be beneficial, in conjunction with the given source. Otherwise it should remain removed - Wikipedia:Facts precede opinions What do you think? Tipaloo (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Good thought - I've added another source and a clause on covid+podcasts more generally to give it some context. —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Ganesha811 I don't feel like it adds much to the page as it's just an opinion. I think that the affect COVID had on the podcast is interesting, but I think trying to find another supporting source about how covid affected podcasts would be beneficial, in conjunction with the given source. Otherwise it should remain removed - Wikipedia:Facts precede opinions What do you think? Tipaloo (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)