Talk:The Broadway

Retailing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Retailing To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : SM Lanang Premier
Copyedit : Retailing in India
Expand : :- Please expand this project's list of articles. The subcategories of Category:Retailers is also an excellent starting point.
- Expand this project's image gallery page

- More articles for expansion: Automated retail, Big-box store, Chain store, Hypermarket, Store manager
NPOV : Retail loss prevention
Photo : Retail design
Stubs : Leakage (retail), Retail geography
Verify : Department store, Discount store, Retail clerk, Retail in the Republic of Ireland, Retail media, Retail software, Suggested retail price
Other : * Please add this project's banner {{WikiProject Retailing}} to retail-related talk pages. Also, bots can be utilized to automate this task.
- Also, add biographies to the articles list.

–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.

Requested move[edit]

The Broadway (Department Stores) → The Broadway … Rationale: The Broadway is the name of the store, and the links at The Broadway are intended for this article. --mattbr³⁰ 16:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Nightst a llion (?) 11:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization[edit]

In later years, the store was advertised as "The Broadway," with a capital T, but mostly it was just "the Broadway." BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Table[edit]

Keizers, sorry hoor, and I don't know if you created this table--but it's a prime example of why not to have tables. It's got nine columns--or is it ten? with one mistaken one? and it has rows that I think are footnotes for the entries just above (a decidedly unwieldy and opaque way to do things); such a table is pretty much impossible to edit for the average editor. It's also very likely to just not render properly at all on mobile devices. Please consider simplifying this greatly. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]