Jump to content

Talk:The Brylcreem Boys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interned Allied Forces

[edit]

The latest edition says that Irelend rather did not intern allied forces. This website: [1] shows that there were some allied servicemen interned.

It says: On the 21 Dec 1940, five British airmen were interned. Two of these pilots were forced to land there Miles Master aircraft near Dundalk, Co. Louth, thinking it was Northern Ireland. They were:

William A. Proctor from Blairgowie, Perthshire, Scotland.

Aubrey R. Covington from Kingston on Thames.

Three pilots baled out of their Blenheim bomber over Co. Donegal.

Sergeant Douglas V. Newport.

Sergeant Sydney J. Hobbs.

Sergeant Herbert W. Ricketts.

Allied internees were released by 1943, but the film describes the events 1940/41 (or 41/42 - correct me), so the situation was not as unlikely as it looks. Maybe just the number of Ally prisoners in the film is too big. Jasra 18:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

brylcreem

[edit]

why are they named the brylcreem boys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.196.195 (talk) 19:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because brylcreem was popular with RAF pilots. - ClemMcGann (talk) 10:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Brylcreem Boys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]