Talk:The Concept of Law
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]the 'main ideas' found in the book is found (i.e. repeated) too in the entry on HLA hart. Chensiyuan 08:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I removed the reference to Saint Lazare who is an entirely unimportant and unrecognizable name in the field. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.191.184.109 (talk) 08:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
This book is humorous. Because morality and law should never be separated. Essentially this book is an ironic essay on how the law itself demonstrates to be criminally incompetent. Separating morality from law is also grounds for dictatorship. Gosh, the 1960's were very bad. Yes, I know this is not a forum. Deal with it. Please don't erase this because you feel it is within your right. You are not helping. ....SandwitchHawk.... (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
I like this article.
[edit]I haven't read The Concept of Law or watched YouTube videos explicating the book; but, I really like the layout of this article. The section on Hart's empirical realism was done nicely. Good job!
- Start-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles