Talk:The Dark Saga/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 12:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sometimes focused more on the album cover (see for example the Background section)
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Since the "Background" section mainly informs us about the cover art, I suggest renaming this section and moving it down. I would expect the musical background in this section.
That is the only major issue. --Tomcat (7) 13:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Background" has now been renamed "Cover art" and moved down. That should hopefully take care of the issues.--SilverBullitt (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]