Jump to content

Talk:The Division Bell/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:

I will be reviewing this article. At first glance, you need to correct the infobox as per {{infobox album}} by moving the critical reviews to the #Reception section. Also, you need to wikilink your sources and not just list them as "allmusic.com" or "billboard.com". --Legolas (talk2me) 07:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to really quickly note that Ref #49 (http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.chartFormatGroupName=Albums&model.vnuArtistId=61137&model.vnuAlbumId=768708) is a deadlink that needs to be fixed. –MuZemike 22:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

This was not marked as "under review" at WP:GAN, so I'll take over. Pyrotec (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pyrotec - I had wondered what was happening here... Parrot of Doom 13:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not a lot it seems. But should be finished today - depends if I find "errors" that I need fixing. Pyrotec (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I now know what Andy Mabbett does in the real world. Pyrotec (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ta very muchly :) Parrot of Doom 15:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, well-referenced article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]