Talk:The Epinal

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2022. The result of the discussion was merge.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Epinal redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 1 February 2013 by reviewer Ktr101 (talk · contribs).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advertisement[edit]

This page reads like an advert for the paper. It needs a complete rework and removal of the lengthy sections on the founders. 143.167.210.64 (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks to be factually correct and is properly sourced and referenced. Founders seem relevant and evidence substantiated. Timsmith2408 (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]