Talk:The French Democracy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting review, checking quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC) {{pass} No problems with quick fail. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
Lead: ✓ Pass

Synopsis: ✓ Pass I replaced with with using, better grammar.

Background and production: ✓ Pass, I made some minor grammatical corrections.

Reception and impact: ✓ Pass Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
b (MoS):
The article conforms to WP:MOS Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
All references check out
b (citations to reliable sources):
All appear to be to WP:RS
c (OR):
I find no evidence of WP:OR Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects):
The article is broad in its scope
b (focused):
This article is focussed on its subject. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
This ia fair representation without bias. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
I find no evidence of edit warring, the article when in stub form survived an AfD, but is now well developed. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
Images are tagged and licensed or when non-free use, correctly argued fair use rationale.
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Correctly captioned. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I have no hesitation in passing this article for GA status. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]