Talk:The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz Talk 12:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

* The definition of the book as a religious text needs a reference. I could not find any RS defining it so. It is defined as a parody in some places : Done

  • Need neutral references and neutral RS facts. The ref used may be publicity (is non-neutral):
    • "The open letter was printed in many large newspapers, including the New York Times, Washington Post, and Chicago Sun Times"
    • "Henderson states on his website that more than 100,000 copies of the book have been sold."
  • Nothing about the structure of the book like how many chapters, summary of each.
  • Also, how is the book used by the practitioners (if I may say so) of Pastafarianism.
  • One of the "I'd really rather you didn'ts" is repeated. Is the whole list needed? If yes, repetitions should be avoided.
  • A section about direct comparison with the Bible (other religious texts, it parodies) is needed, like "Moses giving the Ten Commandments == "I'd really rather you didn'ts" ) Has any official representative of the Church reacted to it?
  • the page numbers associated with particular sentences can be given for Van Horn, Gavin; Lucas Johnston (2007)
  • In single references, "p." (eg. p. 58) should be used, not pp. 58.
  • LEAD should have something about organization of the book: chapters etc. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with the improvements. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]