Jump to content

Talk:The Habit of Fire/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Novice7 | Talk 09:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this article is not close to GA criteria.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Prose could use some tweaking. Also, quoted information should be inside quotes. No external links on the lead.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I'm unsure about forum usage. Maybe some other source? Also, Band line-up needs verification.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Nothing mentioned about critical reception, charts etc.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    I don't see any biased stuff.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edit-wars or stuffs.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The album art could use a better rationale.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Sorry. You have to work more. See Breakout (album) or Ray of Light or Reign in Blood for an example.