Talk:The Lady of Shalott (painting)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from The Lady of Shalott (painting) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Model
[edit]Perhaps a mention of Muriel Foster as the probable model? Don't ask me to hunt down references though. Andplus 10:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Missing Links
[edit]Several of the links to other paintings are broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanarock (talk • contribs) 03:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Original Research problem
[edit]The original research I am referring to is the following line (and lines afer it)
"Although the painting is typically Pre-Raphaelite in composition and tone, its central framing, as well as the linear echoes between the leaves of the overhanging trees and the hair and creases of the lady's dress and tapestry, betray formal and spatial elements borrowed from the earlier Neo-Classical style."
This is subjective. Who says it is Pre-Raphaelite? Who says its framing (etc) borrows from Neo-classical? The person who wrote the lines in this article? God? Obama? Who? True or not, you can't just write things like that and stick a Q.E.D. on it, and walk away. You have to back it up. Please don't remove the original research tag without correcting this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.61.158.238 (talk) 05:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)