Jump to content

Talk:The Lich/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I am taking a look and making some straightforward copyedits as I go. I'll jot questions/issues below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The episode guest stars Lou Ferrigno as the hero Billy, and Ron Perlman as the Lich - this sentence is in the present tense whereas those around it are in past tense.

*In the opening scene, Herpich used unicorn symbolism, most notably the tapestry The Unicorn is in Captivity and No Longer Dead, a piece of the seven-part tapestry The Hunt of the Unicorn, to illustrate the themes of the episode - this sentence is hard to follow with all teh commas. I'd write it as, "In the opening scene, Herpich used unicorn symbolism, most notably the tapestry The Unicorn is in Captivity and No Longer Dead—a piece of the seven-part tapestry The Hunt of the Unicorn—to illustrate the themes of the episode" :*Good point. Changed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Never mind, I got through to it. To be entirely honest, this section pertains almost exclusively to "Finn the Human", and I'm not sure how I'd integrate it into this article. Do you have any ideas?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • One way would be to put a footnote at the end of the first sentence in the third para of the Plot section using the 'efn' template, like I have done in many articles such as pyxis etc. Then in the footnote, mention farmworld (alternate reality where the cataclysm doesn't happen) and use the book as a ref. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: -a nice little read... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]