Talk:The Light of the Sun/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 15:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A very solid article, just a few things to straighten out:
- Background: You write she was "countersued" by Hidden Beach. Why "counter", did she sue them first?
- Track list needs a source.
- Two dead links-
That's it, on hold for now. Good job! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Zwerg Nase:, I have no idea why it was worded that way lol. I changed it to "sued", added a source for the track listing, and replaced the dead links. Dan56 (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)