Talk:The Magdalene Sisters

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

The Magdalene Sisters is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

?[edit]

I've noticed that an article called Magdalen Asylum is a cleaned up version of this one

Rejuvenation of Synopsis[edit]

I have taken a little bit of time to write a big chunk of the synopsis. I found the original did little in the way of summerising the actual event of the film and it was quite central on Sister Bridget. I have reworked the Sister Bridget section and written a little on some of the other significant scenes of the film (the humiliation, the escape etc.). I haven't reverted, however, into blow by blow plot summary, which does not seem quite approapriate in the article. I hope others are happy with the changes I have made.

BTW: Is the woman who helps Bernadette and Rose a relative? Clarification anyone? Thanks!

She should be her (Bernadette) Dublin's cousine, the one she only saw once before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.100.18 (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Change summary[edit]

I have deleted the section on the history of Magdalen Asylums. The section was wriiten in an unfropessional manner, and it was not related to the movie itself. Sure, the movie is about the Magdalen Asylums, but if someone is interested in knowing more about the Magdalen Asylums, they will go to its own article, which contains much more information, presented in a more clear format. The section on the history of Magdalen Asylums was useless and duplicate in my opinion.

Made some changes[edit]

Changed some sentences for grammar or just bad structuring. I also deleted or altered certain elements that were either unnecessarily cluttering up the character biographies or wrong. This was a great film and I made the edits last night after just watching it for the fourth or so time. Fermentor 09:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Magdalene Sisters poster.jpg[edit]

Image:The Magdalene Sisters poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed[edit]

This is not supported by the source: However, the book on which the film is partly based has been shown to be a fabrication, and the allegations therefore suspect. The author of the book upon which the film is based has misled the public about her education and upbringing, and it is unlikely that she had any contact with the religious order at all. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 02:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worth noting?[edit]

I think that the fact that the Vatican has banned this movie is notable, but I dont know how to put that in. Could someone please add it?
List of banned films, and http://www.michigandaily.com/content/controversial-film-sisters-hits-dvd

What does that mean if a film is "banned"? Does that make it illegal to possess the DVD when on Vatican property, like the Holy See or any major basilica? The Vatican no longer publishes an Index of prohibited works, although my copy of the Index lists primarily works of faulty theology to prevent people from being led astray in their studies. Vatican officials denounce plenty of things, like sexy Madonna videos, but banned? What does that mean, exactly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.247.254 (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to know what the basis is for the assertion that the film has been "officially banned" by the Vatican. I am aware of a critical review of the film in the Vatican's semi-official newspaper L’Osservatore Romano; but a bad review in a newspaper hardly constitutes an "official ban" whatever that means. I think either a citation from a Vatican source or some other kind of credible evidence is needed to back up this assertion.Ocyril (talk) 11:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never banned[edit]

I concur that it was never banned, and deleted the reference that was in the article. The news article that provided the citation did say "officially", but doesn't state its source for the claim, leaving us with a rather vague assertion. I have another article that refutes the claim. Here is its reference should it be needed for future editing.

Greydanus, Steven D. ["The Magdalene Sisters Controversy Revisited"]. Decent Films Guide: film appreciation and criticism informed by Christian faith. 2010. Accessed September 18, 2011.