Talk:The Modern Antiquarian

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Modern Antiquarian article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I added the cover image that appears to have prompted the 'possible copyright violation'- I'm pretty sure it constitutes fair use. How come the text is gone too? Seems a bit of overkill? NickW 22:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

I'd take issue with the sentence "A highly entertaining documentary film of the same name was made for the BBC in mid-2000." I did see the program, and yes it was entertaining (as any TV program can be), but in what sense was it highly entertaining? I've removed the words 'highly entertaining' from the article. JimChampion 23:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]