Talk:The Mugwumps (band)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

On 10 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to The Mugwumps. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Untitled[edit]

Track Listing of Album

I can see no reason why the track listing of the album should have been removed as "copyrighted material". This is nonsense and the listing should be restored. Skinsmoke 17:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mugwump which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Different band[edit]

Jug Band Music b/w Bald Headed Woman (1966 Sidewalk 900) ** this is a different group also called Mugwumps **

Were Cass and Denny in the Mugwumps same time as M&Ps?[edit]

The releases listed for this band came two years after Cass and Denny joined the Mamas and Papas and a couple years after Sebestian formed the Lovin' Spoonful, too. Were these 1967 releases a case of unreleased material being issued due to its members becoming famous elsewhere or is this more correctly categorized as a side gig? 136.159.160.122 (talk) 21:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The top of their pictured album reads "An Historic Recording Late Summer of '64..." So this is a later release of material recorded earlier. DougHill (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 May 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 16:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Mugwumps (band) → The Mugwumps – No other page with this name. Jax 0677 (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Jax 0677 (talk) 23:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The Mugwumps should redirect to Mugwumps, the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to remain with a dab then. I would weakly support the original proposal, as the band are exclusively known with "The" while the activists are not, but overall maybe nothign to choose between them. — Amakuru (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. pageviews are relatively similar over 90 days with a small recent bump for the band, probably ~~an album release or something~~ definitely something other than a release, I just noticed the years active lol. ASUKITE 15:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah maybe the DAB would be best of which it already goes to. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and redirect to Mugwumps. A definite article is no disambiguator at all. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think redirecting to Mugwumps is a good idea, especially when Wikinav picks up 105 incoming pageviews from it to Mugwump (disambiguation) and zero outgoing pageviews to Mugwumps. I don't know if a move is warranted here, but a primary redirect seems unwarranted in this case. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 11:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.