Talk:The Number of the Beast (album)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 16:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course!

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The last part of the first sentence, there is something missing ahead "the US", maybe "in"

And the second sentence also has the "in the US" at the end; maybe rephrase to remove repetition.

"and their last with " - Their last what? His last appearance?

""new"" - why in quatation marks? If he debuted on this album, this should be mentioned in the lead

"According to several interviews with Bruce Dickinson, he" - "he" is Harris?

"song-writing" - this should be written together

"having to give what he calls a "moral contribution", i.e. having an influence on particular tracks without giving enough creative input to earn a writing credit.[6]" - sounds like noun + ing. Abbreviations should be spelled out, or replaced with better words

"an albums"

"having to write an albums worth of songs almost entirely from scratch for the first time.[3]" - needs rephrasing

B-side should be linked

Quotation marks in quotes should be replaced with apostrophes

"star struck" - what does that mean?

"90's" should be "90s" per WP:DECADE

"A Tribute to the Beast, Vol. 2 " should be italicized

"Sebastian Bach" "Skid Row" and "Iced Earth" should be linked

""The Number of the Beast" quotation mark missing
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
How reliable is
[1]

[2] (Firefox blocks this website)

[3]

Amazon? - remove; also you claim that all the information in the first section of "Appearance in media" is available in [4], which is totally incorrect

Youtube? - remove; easily fails WP:V and WP:RS

Myspace? - remove; similar situation as with Youtube.

Many references have no publisher, accessdate, etc--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 13:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comment[edit]

Hi, I have addressed all the issues that have been outlined so far.--Nerdtrap (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced unsuitable refs (although how an amazon link which details the soundtrack is unacceptable I don't know). Removed Uncle Howie records because I couldn't find a replacement. Also removed the part about Nick Tershay for the same reasons (although I would have thought that an interview with the man himself would have been fine, even if it was on Youtube!!!).--Nerdtrap (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]