Talk:The One I Love (manga)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe One I Love (manga) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 13, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The One I Love (manga)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DragonZero (talk · contribs) 02:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC) I will review it, looks passable on a quick skim. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Comments below


*These are the groups I found in publisher_other. Germany, Egmont Manga & Anime
France Tonkam
Spain Norma Editorial
South Korea Seoul Media Group The article only covered France and Germany. If you don't have information on ALL the publishers of this manga, reword the sentence to something like "The One I Love has received localizations in other languages such as XXX in France and XXX in Germany" Afterwards, delete publisher_other.

  • "... illustrations of the female protagonists did not did not to reflect the manga's targeted demographic of young women, and resembled junior high students." Clarify.
Still unclear. Does the author mean they wanted to appeal to to young women with their art style but it was too kiddish so it appealed to junior high students instead? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 18:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Let's see... With The One I Love, Clamp was targeting a "slightly older audience", being published in a magazine for young women (Young Rose); (lead artist) Nekoi felt that her drawings of the women in the collection, including those of working/professional women, all looked as if they were junior high students. Does that help? Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 01:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You should just say the last point about how the author considered her drawings of older women made them look like junior high students. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 19:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 02:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

*The development section does not need reviewer's opinions.

  • "According to Okhawa, The One I Love focuses on "girls' love and the insecurity, happiness, regret, and satisfaction that accompanies that love."" Is this noteworthy? Was that the goal they had in mind when creating the stories?
  • External link is dead. Wayback machine reveals the website was closed down.
  • Jason Thompson disambig.

Otherwise, it looks like its suited for GA. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for taking the time to review! I think I have addressed your concerns, if not, please let me know. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 18:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only the clarification left, then I'll pass it. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 18:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better now? Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]