Talk:The Outies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

United States: 50,000 Challenge

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Untitled[edit]

This article should not be deleted because I am still in progress of updating the information to include the hundreds of award winners who deserve to be recognized publicly for their leadership in LGBT leadership.

hi, Ajkeating, you should include references from reliable sources or otherwise indicate notability. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi, Baffle gab1978, I'm working on it--thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajkeating (talk • contribs) 22:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For everyone excited by the prospect of A7'ing this ....[edit]

...The Outies are an award, not (so far as I can surmise from the article "a real person, individual animal(s), organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content", and therefore A7 is inappropriate. Am I missing something? --j⚛e decker ^talk 06:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing[edit]

I'm starting to try and clean up and prettify the references section here, but there are significant problems. Many of the articles are copies of the same press release, which means that they aren't really WP:RS in terms of establishing notability under [[WP:GNG[[. I don't have cycles to really track all this down tonight, but I will keep poking at it, if you come across this and want to work on improving the references please have at it! --j⚛e decker ^talk 00:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time[edit]

Why is the period spanning 2010-12 listed? Is it just the article hasn't been updated in such a long time? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 12:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]