Talk:The Outrage

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Westerns: Film Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Film task force.

Spoilers wanted![edit]

How does this film end? What does the prospector have to say? Does the director leaving the ending ambiguous or is one view shown to be the "real" one? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 18:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 August 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. EvertonFC13^(talk2me) 20:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Outrage → The Outrage (1964 film) – Other than three "The" entries, all listings at the Outrage disambiguation page bear the main header "Outrage". The three are this 1964 film, a feature from Thailand The Outrage (2011 film) and a controversial TV episode The Outrage (Marcus Welby, M.D.). Are the other two entries sufficiently notable to require this 1964 film to have a parenthetical qualifier appended? In such an eventuality, The Outrage (film) would redirect to the Outrage dab page. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 15:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This film receives 72.8% of the page views of the other topics named "The Outrage", despite being the oldest of the three.[1]--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cúchullain's comments. This is somewhat similar to how Matrix has its own disambiguation page, but The Matrix film exists as the primary topic when "The" is included in the search or link. Another non-film example is Joker versus The Joker. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No reason for it. No need to make a title bigger than it needs to be. It is not being confused by another entry of similar title, and it is clear from the first sentence that the subject is a film made in 1964. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose existing situation passes both criteria for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.