Talk:The Problem Solverz/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna(talk to me!) 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @23W: Sorry, I had other stuff going on, and then I decided to wait until the third round of the GA Cup began. Here are my comments. Johanna(talk to me!) 00:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Instead of "from Cartoon Network", I would say "which aired on Cartoon Network".
  • You can remove "problem-solving" as that's what detectives are by definition
  • "Jones is a member of the art collective Paper Rad." This sentence comes out of nowhere, and I don't see how it's relevant.
  • I notice nothing about the series' cancellation from CN's or Netflix's schedules, both in the lead and the article. Could you include something?
  • What do you mean that the characters were created "as a response"?
  • "For television Jones..." how is this relevant, particularly to what you were just discussing?
  • It's up to you, but I wouldn't add that Adult Swim is the nightly division of the network.
  • "The plan was pulled off..." A lot of things wrong here. First, this phrasing is informal. Also, what "plan", and who was involved? I'm confused.
  • "Writing was the lengthiest facet" I'm a bit confused
  • It seems like critics have noted the bright art style, but unless a specific one has made the comparison to Paper Rad, I would remove that part from the image caption.
  • Remove the clause "Rather than battle it" and separate the two remaining independent clauses with a semicolon.
  • I would add the critical consensus back at the top of "Reception".
  • Your refs are impeccable. For an article of this length, I don't think I've seen such consistently reliable and well-formatted sources. None of them are broken. Nice job on that!
    • Johanna I think I've provided for all comments. Thank you so much for reviewing! I think my referencing skills are all muscle memory at this point, heh. 23W 01:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]