Talk:The Program (novel)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Program (novel) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from The Program (novel) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the novel The Program draws on influences from Lifespring, Werner Erhard, and Large Group Awareness Training?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May.

Wikipedia

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Started article...[edit]

With material from (13) citations. Smee 01:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Previous novel[edit]

The previous novel by the same author, The Kill Clause, involves the same characters, same series, continues along the prior plot/background, and the fact that it's being made into a movie is worth mentioning, at least, I think so. Thoughts? Smee 00:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

That wasn't clear at all (see my edit). It just sounded random, like an attempt at giving the current book more legitimacy ("the author is popular because some other book of his is being made into a film!"). So just add more context to the statement. howcheng {chat} 01:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will do that. Sorry about the confusion, and thanks for being so polite. Smee 02:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Notice re Checkuser case[edit]

A recent checkuser case resulted in "confirm" on several users as sockpuppets of each other, that edited articles on closely related topics including Landmark Education, Werner Erhard, Landmark Education litigation, Scientology and Werner Erhard, Erhard Seminars Training, and Werner Erhard and Associates, among others. As a result, several of these users and sockpuppets of each other have been blocked. The checkuser case page is here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eastbayway. Cirt (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]