Talk:The Recruit (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Recruit (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Australian / New Zealand / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

On 20 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Recruit to The Recruit (film). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 20 December 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Recruit → The Recruit (film) – OK, I'm going to go ahead and argue that there is no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title, or at least that the 2003 film (which was hardly any kind of "blockbuster") doesn't qualify as enough of the primary topic here (outside of the occasional infrequent page view spike), especially in light of the new 2022 TV series. Here are: page views for the articles with this title over the last year. There are now two TV series with this title, plus the film, and a novel article – My recommendation is that all of these articles should all be parenthetically disambiguated, including the 2003 film article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support okay well the page views are pretty clear. Not convinced we need The Recruit (disambiguation) when we have a dab page at Recruit. Although then again recruit might arguably be a redirect to recruitment. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and In ictu oculi. There are 16 bulleted entries listed upon the Recruit disambiguation page, created in 2004, thus there was no need to create, in 2014, a duplicate dab page — The Recruit (disambiguation) — which contains not a single unique entry — all six of its entries are also listed upon the Recruit dab page. Thus, in order to preserve its (admittedly brief) eight-year revision history, The Recruit (disambiguation), as well as The Recruit, should become redirects to the Recruit dab page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 10:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support the film has 71,098 views but the TV series has 57,817[[1]]. Move The Recruit (disambiguation) to base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Is the wikification of "nonlinear cryptography" correct?[edit]

Apokrif (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]