Talk:The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 14 March 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) samee converse 20:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:SUBTITLE, WP:SMALLDETAILS and MOS:TITLECAPS. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been refactored. SITH (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've moved this over from technical requests. I will ping the participants shortly. SITH (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging participants from technical section: Anthony Appleyard, In ictu oculi, Station1, MarkZusab and Gonnym. I have left a direct link on the nominator's talk page. SITH (talk) 14:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SURPRISE. A reader would not expect a title like "God's Rule", "Doomsday Cult", or "Future Jihad" to be about a specific book. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong procedural oppose These should each be discussed separately, since each has differing issues concerning them. A mass nomination is highly disruptive. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose "The Rusdie Affair", that is clearly an atlernate name for the Satanic Verses controversy, as used in the press and on Wikipedia. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose "God's Rule" this is clearly prejudicial in focus only on a book about Islam and not any other topics and religions, perhaps amounting to institutional bias if the move is carried out. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose "Doomsday Cult", WP:NPOVTITLE, unduly demonizes the Moonies, which hasn't committed mass murder/suicide, unlike Jonestown, Aum Shin Rikyo, Order of the Solar Temple, Heaven's Gate. Nor is it the most prominent sect committed to apocalyptism and millennarianism. Leave it as it is, redirecting to doomsday cult. --- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose "Expectation of the Millennium"; that should redirect to Millenarianism -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose all particularly Expectation of the Millennium, The Rushdie Affair, God's Rule, God's Caliph, Future Jihad, Doomsday Cult; less so In the Path of God, Support Maududi and the Making of Islamic Fundamentalism which is just a CAPS problem. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.