Jump to content

Talk:The Saint Patrick's Day Four

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Saint Partick's Four are a group of four non-violent peace activists, currently on trial in Binghamton NY, facing 6 years in federal prision and $250,000 in fines. They have been indicted on one count of Conspiracy to impede and officer of the United States of America. Their trial stands to set a legal presedent as to the power of the government to prosecute dissent.

I deleted this info and redirected to this article.Travb 05:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

[edit]

The article survived an AfD. The discussion can be found here. enochlau (talk) 23:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Saint Patrick's Day Four. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Dispute

[edit]

This article appears to have been written by persons sympathetic to the cause of the members described, as their interactions with law enforcement are not properly engaged with and the focus of the article appears to lie in advertising the personalities and beliefs of those involved rather than presenting their actions from a neutral perspective. For those interested, I am somewhat sympathetic to their cause but think the presentation of this article violates the NPOV spirit. Pbritti (talk) 20:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]