Talk:The Sentinel (2006 film)

Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Collapse Plot[edit]

Make the section on 'plot' (with all the spoilers) collapsed by default and headed with a warning so people don't see spoilers by accident.

"Connection with 24 film" section[edit]

Has this been referenced anywhere and does it make sense at all? Would a film production company test to see if a film is going to be any good by making a film with a similar plotline and one of the same actors - why not just make the 24 movie and be done with it? Seems like pretty expensive market research, and doing both movies would only make both of them do worse, I would have thought .. -- Chuq 05:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which character is The Handler? Cubs Fan 05:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe: 24 and Sentinel are both under FOX - sumguy

W.F.O. & P.I.D.[edit]

The movie mentioned W.F.O. & P.I.D.. Sounds like some agency or unit of it. What those stand for? --Mato Rei 04:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think I have figured them out by myself. They're supposed to be Washington D.C. Field Office (of FBI) & Protective Intelligence Division. In case anyone need it, too. :) --Mato Rei 04:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

constructive feedback on "critical reception" comments[edit]

On 20:28, 8 February 2007 an anonymous user (24.125.0.232) removed comments in the "critical reception" section with the following edit summary: "Don't post that shit again, no one gives a fuck about your review so shut the fuck up". I am happy to discuss why I think the entry should remain and have restored the original text. Thanks and looking forward to a productive and respective dialogue! Hu Gadarn 03:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraphs?[edit]

The plot is kind of a HUGE paragraph that is almost unreadable. Maybe split that up into paragraphs where appropriate? Rob1n 23:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The sentinel.jpg[edit]

Image:The sentinel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filmed in Canada[edit]

It makes more sense to leave it as filmed in Canada --Dlatimer (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who's claiming it was filmed elsewhere? --G2bambino (talk) 18:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to follow the manual of style. --Dlatimer (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Think tank![edit]

The one million deal of this informant, is a real cider suggestion and therefore the snowball rolls in that way. From the microorganism of this dealer to the investingation structure smells somthing real bad.

Without any proves the deconstruction of a fair character should be worked out. It#s a chain of prejudiced helpers who act analog like this. Power in hirachie of a low level fights against authority. Well done and actual.Democratic borders are visible and time has got a human code!--Danaide (talk) 12:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 plot remarks[edit]

1. "Several agents are killed, including Ed and Pamela". Who are Ed and Pamela? It's the only place their names are mentioned, so it makes no sense and the names should be removed.
2. Jill Marin / Breckinridge: Breckinridge always appears like this, the first name appears only once. I think "Jill Marin" should be "Marin" for consistency. Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 06:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]