Talk:The Shooting
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927184648/http://www.impossiblefunky.com/archives/issue_7/7_hellman.asp?IshNum=7&Headline=Interview:%20Monte%20Hellman to http://www.impossiblefunky.com/archives/issue_7/7_hellman.asp?IshNum=7&Headline=Interview%3A%20Monte%20Hellman
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Citation, Rewrite, and Expansion
[edit]This article is poorly written/developed and needs to be rewritten entirely in order to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards. The Production section is written in a style and tone that doesn't meet Wikipiedia's guidelines of an encyclopedic style/tone. This should be rewritten so that it meets these standards and expended when needed. The Reception section is also poorly written and contains information that is unsourced. The section should be rewritten and all unsourced information either given proper citations from reliable sources or removed from the article if non can be found. The article is also missing important information on the film's releases which needs to be added to the article with proper citations from reliable sources. This article has potential to become GA or FA if enough attention is given to it. Hopefully someone comes along and gives it the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack 17:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)