Jump to content

Talk:The Sims 2: Celebration Stuff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't think it should be merged--that would be confusing!*camisado* 01:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How so? Most of these articles are very short because there is very little in them. Since they're a series, merging them makes sense.--Crossmr 07:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I support the merge because each of the Stuff Pack articles are short. However, I would suggest changing the title of the merged article to The Sims 2 Stuff Packs as opposed to The Sims 2 stuff expansion packs since that could cause confusion with the actual Expansion Packs (e.g. The Sims 2 Seasons).--Funnykidrian 15:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also support this merge because each page is very short and Wikipedia can be very helpful if one is looking for this thing in general.-- Apple~ User—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.104.111.171 (talkcontribs) 13:09, March 17, 2007.

I dont think that we should merge because it would take longer to see changes and would take longer to read. Most other expansion pack's pages arent merged into a combination.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Markintellect (talkcontribs) 13:27, March 17, 2007.

These aren't expansion packs. They're stuff packs which have a very small amount of content in them and very rarely introduce any gameplay. The articles on all of them are very short. ANd I'm not sure what you mean by "it would take longer to see changes" What changes and why would it take longer?--Crossmr 16:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we just organize the little box thingy better, like instead of a ton of things under "The Sims 2", maybe spilt it in to sub lists for EPs and SPs.*camisado* 18:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


it would make sense to merge, they are all stuff packs... i can see the sense in keeping each individual EP seperate but theese are really just small additions to the main game, not really essential to gameplay, just a slight enhancement.

172.201.5.103 20:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reckon we should- it's a waste of pages if we make a page on each stuff pack when they're only about five sentences long.