Jump to content

Talk:The Supremes (The West Wing)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Errors"

[edit]

Is Josh's statement about 6 moderates really an error in the script? To me, it seems more like a realistic portrayal of the use of hyperbole by a political operative. --Hickoryhillster (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk16:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Converted from a redirect by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 08:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good to me. I notice, however, some close paraphrase from the Slate source -- could this be fixed? (Ping me with a response, or else I may not see it) jp×g 04:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that in the reaction section, all the quotes from Slate are attributed, so that's fine; but in the plot section, it seems to use almost all the same quotes from the episode as the Slate article, which gives me some pause. jp×g 05:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me, pass. jp×g 06:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting to Prep 6Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]