Talk:The Times (TV program)

	Australia portal The Times (TV program) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled discussion

To Sarah: why did you remove this information?

"The Times was a critical success - respected and praised by critics for its slick, entertaining approach to news - but it attracted few viewers in its ridiculous and irregular late-night timeslots (it was bumped around the schedules, sometimes waiting until almost midnight before it went to air)."

The show was supported and praised by the critics in major newspapers. The show did attract poor ratings. The show did have an inconsistent timeslot, and often would air very late, and in the 2 years the show aired, it aired on three different days - hardly consistent. The show did have a timeslot proven to be unsuitible for current affairs shows.

I don't see anything wrong with my statement, yet you seem to think I made it up? Austvguy 03:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you cite some sources for those claims, it's editorial comment and against NPOV. Please don't conclude I think you're making things up or doing something shifty as I don't think that at all. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 03:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]