Talk:The View from Halfway Down/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

Plot[edit]

  • Without the names in parathesis, this section is 414 words. MOS:TVPLOT says that episode-articles should be at max 400 words so try removing some.
    •  Done 376 words now, minus the parenthetical acting credits Kncny11 (shoot) 17:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, some links here and in other sections lead to disambiguation pages, so try fixing those links.

Production[edit]

  • You can't cite WP:IMDB, even if you disguise it as the Internet Movie Database.
  • "Kazzaz'" → "Kazzaz's"
  • Remove the comma after "within the show".
  • "with series finale" → "with the series finale"
  • "V." → "V".
  • The line containing "suicide by jumping" should probably link to "Later", the episode in which the event took place.
  • "[i]t felt" → "it felt"

Reception[edit]

  • "an A writing, stating" → "an "A", stating"
  • Link IndieWire.
  • The first sentence says the episode received praise from "many reviewers", but only two are listed that actually talked about the episode. Try adding more.
    •  Done Rewrote/regrouped the entire section after digging up more articles Kncny11 (shoot) 17:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last sentence has a source from Gold Derby, a website that isn't that reliable. Can a more reliable source be swapped in?
    •  Done Replaced with an IndieWire citation saying that "Free Churro" was the first nomination in that category for BoJack Kncny11 (shoot) 17:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Vanity Fair with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Forbes with "|url-access=limited".
  • Try linking every website used in every citation.

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·